Share
4,015 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 22
clock Created with Sketch. 20/07/18
09:33
Share
Originally posted by Radicool
↑
Your assumption may also be invalid as many of those 75 shareholders represent large SUPER funds which have hundred thousand to million members. The second error in your argument is that you appear to make the assumption that because the larger shareholders are such that they are trying to oppress the smaller shareholders. There is no evidence of that in fact it's not a club. One could conclude, that the rewarded one's, decide how much there namesakes should be rewarded' Really you appear to give the impression that there are two groups - the larger shareholders who all live in penthouses and stick together and the rest which are smaller minorities who cannot win. However the will of the majority does clearly control a company just that that majority is based upon the holding of investment by way of shares It is the rewarded one's, who determine whether there namesakes deserve their rewards.
Expand
Hi radicool
(20min delay)
