Exploration targets, page-9

One further thing.
I'm basically very, very careful with "samples".
To extrapolate them.
(Doing so) It gives you much, much room for "tears". Starting the paingame.

But here I have (also) to say: the very most samples are beyond their "range" estimate/target, the lowest @least @THE upper end.
And they cover meaningful parts, of their target estimate.
Further, Steve wrote they always try to calculate the "target range carefully", and he said prooooobably "truth" should come in raaather in the "upper half".

So, I'm nonetheless careful with these things, and "samples" in connection with these "targets", but nonetheless have the impression the indications are pretty, pretty good related to their target.
No idea where they'll come in, but(beyond 1st pass drilling, if they dill it "out") for may let's say arrrrround 2,xMio Ounces @may arround 10g/t it doesn't looks really bad I guess.