Duster 2.0, page-19

Its not adding up to me. The initial announcement headlined "Sulphide" which sent the market into a frenzy, which was to be expected given market expectations, but no commentary was made as to what the sulphide was. And the Niton XRF was malfunctioning therefore one would assume the Sulphide was based on visual observation of the core. Okay, that's history. Now today, the announcement describes the nature of the sulphides but reference is still made to the malfunctioned XRF ( in the rear section of the announcement) and also it states the samples have been sent to the lab for assaying, so presumably (?) the identification of the sulphides was done visually. If it was, why cannot it have been done for the initial announcement. Unless I have missed something.

I did exit the stock on the day of the first announcement because I felt uncomfortable with the pronouncement of sulphide without any further elaboration as to its nature.