...siamese...i'm one of arq's shareholders and not happy about...

...siamese...i'm one of arq's shareholders and not happy about the way in which roc and arq have handled the last two announcements on dunsborough...although i haven't been stung badly while still holding arq got up one hour late this morning (WA) and discovered my outstanding top up order under 1.20 had been filled while i was still snoring away and not dreaming about a plunge in sp because of this mornings back paddle ann...anyway...had a closer look at all the ann from friday and today...i find it interesting that on friday the first to ann was ROC hyping the find, followed by ARQ basically with a copy of ROC's...and then lastly AWE with a more sober ann...this morning the reverse...AWE was first to ann that maybe this well not a producer...then ROC with the same and lastly ARQ...this time clearly those three must have co ordinated their ann. for whatever reason...clearly the friday announcement was a bit over the top and maybe even deliberately misleading positive led by roc and copied by arq...now why was that so....??..i had a look at the three partners shareprice graph...a correlated fact appeared to me....seems that both ROC and ARQ are in serious need to boost their sp upwards atm....not so AWE whose sp appears quite stable and fine to me atm...so deliberate or accidental talking up of a still uncertain find by ROC and ARQ to put a run on the board for their respective sp's???...not nice to say the least and i reckon the least we could expect is a thorough apology from roc and arq management about the almost recklessly hyped up statements from friday....???...attempted sp manipulation for ROC and ARQ i'm inclined to believe it was....pretty crook effort by roc and arq management if you ask me....but that's just my personal opinion and perspective on the continuing dunsborough story....wouldn't stand up in court of course..:-)