Another post x 2 copied from IGO. Another poster: "80ppm Cu...

Another post x 2 copied from IGO.

Another poster: "80ppm Cu doesn't look exciting to me, sorry to say. 0.1% in two very thin sections is the best. Best of luck to holders."

SM in response:

"In isolation, the copper numbers are not appealing. However, in context, they take on much better light.

But your selection of 80 ppm is not representative. There are higher and lower readings than that and there is a range of widths too.

The author even selects a 'moderate copper anomalism' in D002 of 0.9m at 610 ppm as part of his positive assessment of the drilled areas, stating that it is associated with anomalism of a multi-element suite - Ag, As, Au, Bi, Mo, Sb, Se, Te and Tl - 'which is consistent with VMS-style copper-gold deposits'.

The author also selects 'the high-order copper anomalism' reported in C002 on 2/10 of 28m at 1,193 ppm stating that it is associated with anomalism of a multi-element suite of Ag, Au, Bi, Mo, Sb, Se and Tl

These are just pinches from the report, the thrust of which is that IGO thinks that this is still a fertile area for vms cu/au; and to the extent that it wants to drill the off-hole conductor as a priority and has identified 4 (or 5?) other targets."

I am pleased to see some positive SP action today although it's still a tepid reaction. It has though, I suspect, seen the 400+k seller at 1.9c disappear.