does nearology count for nothing?, page-8

sometimes the mystery cant be explained. sometimes it's because of stuff that isn't widely known. for example check out (say) discrepancy between charts for RNI and TLM for an example of variances in pricing of exploration companies. Hold (adjoining) prospective tenements. And both have well respected management teams.

As for ROG looks like it needs a catalyst to spark a move. perhaps the speculative buyers have opted to preferentially load up on MEL instead?

presumably the drivers for ROG will be production flow rates or corporate activity.

i also seem to have (from time to time) on other threads picked up inferences that ROG and MEL management have some sort of relationship. Maybe there is an undisclosed strategy in play between the two companies? Part of which involves ROG managing timing of their own drilling for optimal outcome.