Riskon22 - my understanding as the bidder statement stands, is that if they do not get 90% they can just walk & no one gets paid anything.
They also have the option of getting say 50-60% & going unconditional on that % ownership. They then have a majority holding/vote & can call what ever tune they like. They can then make another offer, higher or lower depending on how they 'play' the shareprice once they have a majority holding, to mop up remaining shareholders.
Once they have a majority holding they basically run the company & can decide who gets Galoc production, what development goes ahead etc.
So in summary, don't get stuck on 90% acceptance for this play to be a good outcome for the raiders/management. Typical is a few days before the end of offer (either as it stands or with an extension) we will get a big scary story about how bad it will be to be a minority SH in NDO & a few more will sell into the offer & the raiders will get an extra few % control, they may end up with say 60-70% of the company & be very happy with that outcome.
Please correct me if I am wrong re the small print in this bidders statement allowing the raider to go unconditional at smaller than 90% if it suits them but this is how some company TO's I have been a shareholder in have played out. The result on the SP after the raiders get control has varied.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- NDO
- Dissention
Dissention, page-15
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 17 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)