Happy to listen to all opinions that's how I learn but not all posts are necessarily opinions.
First why would you listen to an opinion from someone that does not have a skin in the game.
Second attacking management without all the fact is an old forum ruse.
Third these two have suddenly appeared on the scene making Pro AVO Con DIO comments.
That's why i am questioning them.
AVO got lucky with BS because of liquidity issues however despite that they still get across the line. Obviously DIO have something and AVO was trying to get it at a bargain price and did not succeed. If the definition of good management is being childish and unethical in your approach to business then then I don't want any part of AVO. Anyhow AVO have a mountain of debt which from what I have read have just about exhausted their facility and appear to desperate.
Now I ask is DIO a victim of bad management or plain bad luck. The collapse of the walls is more than likely a hazard of the job causing a major set back. Is that managements fault.
The fact remains that all that post here only pretend to know what is going on. Ask yourself this If you really knew what was going on why would your first step be to post at HC.
The reason I'm here is because I don't have the time to be a full time stock watcher and every so often someone posts something of worth that at the very least provkes some thought even if it is on the negative side.
I am sorry to say that those last posts fell well short of the mark to be even considered as valued opinion.
I'm not having a go at you BB cause I agree with what you have said but I am just stating my opinion here and trying to provide some substantive reasoning to my diatribe.
Cheers BW
DIO Price at posting:
79.0¢ Sentiment: LT Buy Disclosure: Held