Decision day, page-33

Attached is an article from May 2017, recently regurgitated by the UK's Spectator magazine. It's slightly dated because it uses 2014 statistics, but it helps to demonstrate the relatively minute inroads that wind energy, but also solar, have been making into global energy provision.

The author is a climate-change sceptic and self-confessed coal beneficiary. But, in short, he argues how much more sense it would make to focus on natural gas and nuclear rather than wind.

What I like about the article is what's clearly missing - a magic bullet able to deliver the potential of natural or bio gas with low-to-negative CO2. The best of both worlds, sounds like the Hazer process.

It's also pretty sobering to read how much coal and steel are needed to build just one wind turbine. Another huge opportunity for Hazer still waiting in the wings.

The last couple of months have been no fun at all, but the signs are that a few good things will fall into place in 2019. Good luck to everyone!