continual negative comments, page-3

Your title thread is one seen over and over again.
Some how a company can only rise if positive comment are made.
Some how the negativity is the sole reason for the share price.
Nothing to do with the constant dilution. Constant debt. Poor production and huge Admin and consulting costs.
No! just the negative posters.

So who should people listen too? Lets just take a look that the last pump and dump in Dec.

Should have people listened to the sudden influx of new posters who just so happened to show up after a 100m shares were converted @ 4c and below. (80%vwap)

Listened to their unsubstantiated rumours which they repeatly tried to post. Listen to the fantastic story's of treasure?
Well worth noting on this chart that there was no announcement that explained this 100% jump. In my view this was a wash trade. (trading between accounts) to get the masses excited. But to get the masses excited. You need a rumour to explain the move.
Once the distribution was over. Who was left holding the bag. The ones that listened to the "negative posters' (who have seen it all before) or fantastic ramper?
I know who made money. The converter at near 100%





People that listened to the ramping here and in the rest of the fleet get slammed. People have had their wealth stripped.
-----------------------

As for hidden agenda's

I think it's safe to say that if you are soliciting people for their voting shares. Your agenda should be questioned.
What do you plan to do with this voting power?

Particularly relevant to you motives on CCC is what you did with your shares in PADBURY MINING PDY.

In mid 2010-2011 Padbury fended off a below market hostile bib by Fe ltd.

TAKEOVER ATTEMPT
The beginning of the financial year was a
particularly difficult time, with a hostile below market target bid by Fe Limited creating an unwanted diversion from the real business of developing our Peak Hill Iron Project.
This action, which lasted just over four months, was eventually defeated with acceptances of less than 1.5% from our shareholder base.Since the takeover bid closed on 22 November 2010, the focus for the Board and management
has been on consolidating Padbury’s position as a
prospective iron ore miner and knuckling down to the work necessary for the Company to achieve its
key project milestones.

On the 18/3/11 (28cps) you and your suds became a substantial holder with 5.36%


On the 18/10/11. (15cps) you used those shares to force a AGM to remove the directors. (page 4)

http://www.aspecthuntley.com.au/asxdata/20111018/pdf/01229782.pdf

You successfully removed the directors in late Oct and then in Nov a merge talks were disclosed with Aurium Resources Ltd (ASX: AGU) which wen through.

Share price as of today. 4cps.

You seen to be well informed about the JSE listing and your rumour of debt being re financed in SA.
Is CCC going to be taken over by Valley and de listed on the ASX?

-----------------------------------

I believe you gave yourself credit for removing OKAP from CCC. Clearly. (if true) a popular move here. Certainly gives you some "cred" here.
What I do find confusing is your long association with pete.
You where a substantial holder in CONTINENTAL CAPITAL LTD. Where you not. In fact this notice puts you right at the beginning of the name change for CONTINENTAL GOLDFEILDS.
If I'm note mistaken. This was a time when the Infamous Sutton was one the board as well.
How did pete take it when you removed him from a company (under many names) that he has been a part of since 1996
----------------

You have freeing given out your email to solicit voting shares from people. so I believe you being so "wounded" about this being shares has very little grounds.

Anyone that received this knows you fall under "research and investment." That is what you are listed under an internet search.
So it's hard to understand when you seem to get something so wrong like NTA.
It's even more perplexing when you tell people the mines are profitable.

Ferreira only turned $17k for the "Q". Included in that was $31.5k of brought in coal. This suggests that it is closer to end of life then thought.

Penumbra run at a loss and I understand they are now having trouble with the roof from an article.

Vlakvarkfontein doing OK at $77k

But of course these are just suds of CCC. You put the hold co costs on top of this. OMG. not even close.
You seem to be very selective with your figures.
But I'll leave that to BBB who "really" does understand it.


You certainly are and interesting person. I do get quite intrigued by interesting people.