conceptual modelling should be banned imo, page-26

Racs, I didn't miss a trade. I know EPS well. I may have even begun the whole EPS thread before and when they listed. One only has to read their prev U "presentations" to understand what happened today. IMO, in situ calculations (of which HC is famous for) are incredibly simplistic and really should only be left up the spec investors like ourselves. The spikes of the companies that you mention may well be symbolic of this where the ASX need to intrude so not only that the law is not broken but also so that the peanut buyers know what they are doing. The Fe frenzy is unfortunate IMO where many are buying on news. This IMO is very similar to the U frenzy where many had no idea of the jargon or even what a paleochannel is. LOL. Protect the retailer IMO.

Hate to say this buddy, but you are very much becoming T4P's shadow - almost coming down to the wording. I know his views on this and it is very obvious why this is his niche. However, getting back to conceptuals, unfortunately the ramping that we saw today usually comes from the same posters time and time again - it is times like these that the ASX should try and both protect and inform them.

Keep it real and good luck.