compounds 100 times better than the standard, page-16

I think it's true that BOS could put out more news. It may get shareholders more involved and interested.

For example the ann. of BOS's compound being 100 times more effective than industry standard [glutaraldehyde] is interesting. But isn't Chlorine bleach which is also used in the industry as much or more effective?

Bleach is very corrosive (oxidising) and while it is very effective on biofilms it is not good on pipes, filters, etc. Is our compound better in that regard?

Glutaraldehyde is not very effective against established biofilms. So what does it mean to say this product is 100 times better than a low performing product? glutaraldehyde is very good at killing free floating bacteria, therefore it is usually used in association with mechanical cleaning.

The question that springs to my mind is; will BOS's product replace the manual cleaning? Will the compound used with glutaraldehyde be all that's required? This would be wonderful. Manual cleaning is difficult and costly, often requiring downtime. Cleaning is not always possible in difficult to reach places.

So yes, more information would provide a better understanding of the value and potential of the product.

It is important at the same time not to raise expectations too high leading to later disapointment from the necessarily long development time. For instance there was this ann. 'Technology effective against microbial corrosion'.

That ann was made in Jul 2005. If you had bought back then expecting instant riches you'd be a bit disapointed by now.