To name yourself using two words from two of the biggest existing pot stocks is lame. What also classic is now they are not spending dollars on advertising according to their paid hc company spruiker. You only have to look at their quarterlies to see where their money is going. Another poster Bas liked to point out various line items in the quarterlies and that payments were made to other companies owned by the directors. I just find it all pretty farcical especially when all the shareholders just except this. If you go back in time and look at previous companies run by the directors where are they now? I think when the SP is low people see dollar signs and just assume astronomical gains because you’re in a certain field ie pot stocks.
I think it’s great to compare these two companies because they are on such different levels. I can really see institutional investors backing EXL. I can only see hopeful dreamers of striking it rich on a heavily diluted stock investing in the other one for any long term.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- EXL
- Competition hybrid name change to compete with Cann Group and EXL
Competition hybrid name change to compete with Cann Group and EXL, page-5
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add EXL (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.4¢ |
Change
-0.002(33.3%) |
Mkt cap ! $6.605M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.4¢ | 0.5¢ | 0.4¢ | $2.103K | 475.4K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
17 | 7670493 | 0.4¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.5¢ | 924824 | 4 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 3797 | 4.490 |
1 | 8000 | 4.480 |
2 | 6000 | 4.470 |
1 | 358 | 4.460 |
3 | 3424 | 4.450 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
4.500 | 31 | 1 |
4.510 | 342 | 1 |
4.520 | 397 | 1 |
4.530 | 370 | 1 |
4.540 | 825 | 2 |
Last trade - 14.04pm 29/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
EXL (ASX) Chart |