-
Share
1,322 Posts.
25
29/12/16
09:14
Share
Bensterz,
The point made by you is a little bit misleading. Here are my arguments:
- you are saying that "the number of shares on issue now is much larger than that in 2014"
- in reality your "much larger" is less than 2: ~490mln shares at the beginning of 2014 and ~960mln now => 960/490=1.96.
Comparing the SP, you will get ~20c then and 4.6c now => 20/4.6=4.35.
So the ratio is 4.35/1.96=2.22, what means that now the shares are 2.22 "cheaper" as at the beginning of 2014.
So a simple arithmetic shows that your point is not quite valid.
Hope this helps.
irynka
-