Share
1,085 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 92
clock Created with Sketch.
24/01/19
10:23
Share
Originally posted by Ozjin:
↑
Thought this better go on this thread. In relation to the Ikon case there is a company called LMC (Litigation Management Counsel) who has a chairman of no other than Dr David King. LMC have a no win no pay system. They use Piper Alderman as their lawyers. Cellmid also use Piper Alderman as their lawyers. I wonder why we didnt use them for the Ikon case? Conflict of interest much? Lots of questions could be made of this but at the end of they day they are all just conspiracies, or are they?
Expand
Some interesting reading - for those who are interested... Relevant "expertise" of Piper Alderman:https://www.piperalderman.com.au/expertise/dispute-resolution-litigation Relevant "experience" and "area of practice" of the Barrister (JC Kelly):https://www.litimetrics.com.au/barristers/2237/john-kelly-sc/ (has he really only done 1 case (ours!!) in the last 14 months?)http://www.9selborne.com.au/barristers/john-kelly-sc/ And, a copy of the actual court "Judgment":https://www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au/decision/5bd90b6fe4b0a8a74af0a934 After perusing these (& a bit more) I still can't work out why CDY were not advised to settle out of court. To me, it was a lot more financially riskier for them to go to Court in the first place - let alone making a cross claim! The ones who had the most to gain were the lawyers. The only positive was learning how Maria seems to certainly take notice of her shareholders.
Last edited by
Dentie :
24/01/19