Share
7,743 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 59
clock Created with Sketch. 06/04/17
07:35
Share
Originally posted by ceh2009
↑
This post could just as easily be called AMN versus RWD! After going back through some old posts I came across a fairly colourful discussion between two posters regarding differences in the measurement of resource between AMN and RWD. It appears that AMN uses "In Situ" and RWD uses "In Brine". Then to add to the confusion there were times when RWD was measuring just the amount that was drainable by trenches (24.4Mt "In Brine") before switching to quoting their resource as all the way to the basement (596Mt). AMN are just talking about what they can produce from trenches (cheap) rather than boreholes (expensive).AMN's *productive* resource is 31% bigger than RWD's.
Expand
To compare apples you should also consider flow rates and grade from the relevant horizons...quite often a deposit regardless of its ore type can be superior in one area but be hindered in others.
Last edited by
Panda7 :
06/04/17
(20min delay)
