Comparing apples with apples, page-11

Hi Panda


Looking at the data on page 3 RWD seem to have averaged the trenches that reached what they refer to as steady state, and extrapolated. I presume the proposed 50km trench network will go through some of the low/no flow ("dewater") areas but I can't see an allowance for that. The second highest flow trench (Trial Trench) is right where the unlined ponds are proposed? PT06 is the only flow data for over a quarter of the available lake area and reached a steady state of ~2.4m3/hr (compared to the 8m3 you refer to).

I agree, L.Disappointment is an awesome SOP deposit. Yes, that's more flow data (quality seems questionable) than the other companies have put out... what gets lost on me is constant desire/need to fluff the overarching result which would have been a good outcome anyway