I disagree, my questions are very relevant ....Cadbury once...

I disagree, my questions are very relevant ....Cadbury once speculated that if they could get every Asian to buy chocolate they would make a fortune, but I doubt they selling Snack for $3.50 each in Indonesia where the average income would be 1/20th of Australians income so despite the population being 10 times ours their overall profitability might only be half of that possible in Australia for ten times the effort in a country were corruption is rampant.

Management can tell shareholders all manner of reasons why they are in Indonesia to make shareholders conclude there is a great potential market of 250 million Coke Cola drinkers just waiting for CCL AMATIL to show them the way...while keeping the management in their jobs for longer chewing up resources. The reality unless other experts can disprove my theory, is that CCL are not permitted to expand further afield as Dominos has been doing because their franchise agreement wont let them start up in the USA or Europe to compete with the main CCL Parent Group, hence why they selling the Franklins Water brand to its parent which is VERY PUZZLING.

If I was a shareholder I'd be asking WHY? WHOSE IDEA WAS THAT?

That the CCL Parent can set up business in Australia selling Franklins Water but CCL AMATIL cant sell in USA?