CO2 smashing extreme weather records, page-875

As a matter of fact, I know that well, its the best way to explain the AGW fraud.



This..




As opposed to this.



And this..




Compared to this. And you could do it with every data point and blow holes in every part of the theory.



It goes on and on.









Everyone focuses on the last century, no one even considers the absurdity of the theory.

And no, I haven't read all of them, maybe about 70% of them, but I did look at all of them over the last year. I try to get through 10 - 20 papers every week.