re: stolwyk represents most?? Ted, You said:" Sorry for clogging...

re: stolwyk represents most?? Ted,
You said:
" Sorry for clogging up the CST board with this".

I don't think you are. If you were, you would have used the ASX-General thread without the code but using the
CST code in the subject line.

The thread which was deleted was one prior to you raising points about the 20 shareholders.

That deleted one referred to socalled ramping and to the study thread.

There is nothing stopping the readers from using the search button and trawl through all the CST posts from the holders. Who says they can't?

On the other hand I am operating within the Sharetrader rules. And these are the rules which matter.

It is not a case of what percentage approves of it although many do.

I am afraid you need to accept this although you may not like it. We have a lot more Study threads than just the CST one.

Be aware that Announcements are the main part of a study thread but important posts, eg ForrestGump's valuation are referred to as well.

The Study thread will stay.

I don't want to get involved in another drawn-out "fight" with you with a subsequent deletion of the thread as occurred before.

Gerry