EME better than AGS because:
AGS only has 25% of the project while EME has around 54%. The comparative resources of uranium currently stand at 32m lbs for AGS vs 23m lbs for EME...so 8m lbs for AGS vs 12.4m lbs for EME...oh and thers also 46 million lbs of Vanadium at EME's project which seems to be ignored. Despite this, AGS has a market cap around $155m and EME has a market cap around $50M.
I also prefer the NT to SA for uranium.
The factor in AGS favour would be that it is much closer to production...however I this does not justify the significant difference in market cap outline above.
But AGS the best of the rest (that i know of).
Cdchi1
cheeky, page-4
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 8 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add EME (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
10.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $14.46M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 394 | 9.7¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 11.0¢ | 25662 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 10.39am 02/12/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| EME (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
