Although my latest theory is the deck is completely stacked in favour of the CIMIC’s and the Samsung’s and the John Holland’s because when they tender projects they bring potential of private investment through their funding arms
- from AFR story above : https://www.copyright link/business...ed-for-infrastructure-bonanza-20170511-gw2x2i
“CIMIC's Spanish parent, Grupo ACS, spotted the emerging infrastructure opportunities in Australia years ago, with chairman Marcelino Fernandez Verdes creating a project finance arm to invest directly in the infrastructure projects it builds (the acronym CIMIC stands for Construction, Infrastructure, Mining and Concessions).”
See How They Fund :
Canberra Light Rail Project Stage One https://www.cimic.com.au/our-business/projects/canberra-light-rail-stage-one:
Cimic’s funding arm Pacific Partnerships “will invest in equity funding along with John Holland, Mitsubishi Corporation and Aberdeen Infrastructure Investments. Pacific Partnerships will also provide operations and maintenance services for 20 years, in partnership with John Holland and DB Engineering & Consulting...”
NSW Premier commits to making it easier for the large ‘banker infrastructure’ companies last June:
Beyond seeking more investment from private companies towards government projects :
https://www.copyright link/business/nsw-overhauls-mega-projects-amid-cost-blowouts-20180604-h10y6b
“NSW is making the biggest overhaul in decades to the way it tenders for and delivers infrastructure projects to create a more "collaborative" relationship with contractors in response to billion-dollar contract disputes and high bidding costs, Premier Gladys Berejiklian will reveal today.
The Premier will outline a swath of changes to its tendering processes at the The Australian Financial Review's National Infrastructure Summit in Sydney.”...
“The new scheme for major projects, outlined by the premier, will look to have a more collaborative relationship with contractors throughout the tender process, and should move away from contracts based around a fixed price, and lump sum payments.”https://www.railexpress.com.au/nsw-to-overhaul-major-projects-tender-model/
The deal is not only to collaborate with and support the larger operators, but to actually put them before the Australian ones according to this story :
https://www.australasianlawyer.com....tructure-plan-pinsent-masons-says-251008.aspx
“If a risk is pushed onto the contractor that it can’t manage, things will deteriorate badly if that risk crystalises, simply because the risk is unmanageable,” Buchanan said. “If contractors are burned so badly that they decide Australia is too risky a market, they will work elsewhere. That will leave a small set of contractors in Australia, dominant in the market, not incentivised to innovate their delivery, and naming their own price for work. An example of this in action is Stage 3 of the Westconnex project where the government received only one bid from the private sector, which was rejected.”
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Bullish Sign? - Bounced off 200 EMA
Although my latest theory is the deck is completely stacked in...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 260 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add NWH (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
$3.95 |
Change
0.030(0.77%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.574B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$3.97 | $3.98 | $3.92 | $2.104M | 533.0K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
5 | 14160 | $3.93 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$3.95 | 10387 | 3 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 5058 | 2.370 |
4 | 18795 | 2.360 |
4 | 37687 | 2.350 |
1 | 7879 | 2.340 |
3 | 24992 | 2.330 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
2.390 | 11634 | 3 |
2.400 | 71958 | 7 |
2.410 | 16085 | 2 |
2.420 | 19941 | 3 |
2.460 | 816 | 1 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 22/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
NWH (ASX) Chart |