brr interview with michael anderson at 10am..., page-5

MA states that the board would look at any offer objectively, should an offer be put to them and do what is best for the company and shareholder's. I honestly believe that MA and the board have credibility and would not compromise it for the sake of a few buck's. Any counter-offer now would have to be an absolute "motsa" or if not, be prepared for a bidding war (IMO). Some of you may enjoy that prospect, but I find it unsettling. I'm after security and I have confidence in EXS going mining. Not just picking tenements here and tenements there for a quick sale. We will have the money after the sale and I would like to see us not only ramping up the drilling (as MA say's), but seriously look at production in a stand-alone situation in the future - Hazel Creek, for example. Let's enjoy the benefits of a few years of investment in exploration and hard work by a group of employees and directors, with a production plant spitting out tens of thousands of tonnes of copper and thousands of ounces of gold. I'm in this for the long haul. Sure, the divi now is nice, but lets not get too carried away with quick bucks in lieu of bigger bucks down the track. When I can afford it, I'll buy more. This is the blue-sky period in my life, I'm here to enjoy it to it's maximum. I deserve that much.
There are a bunch of loyal employee's and shareholder's who perhaps, wouldn't like to carry on with another company. We have a board which is mining-savvy and bleed gold and copper out of their viens. I would like to thank each and everyone of them for their dedicated work to getting the company to where it is today.
I'd also like to again, thank all on HC for their many constructive contributions. It makes understanding what's going on just that much easier.