galaxy, your an unfamiliar name, so are many of you. Assuming...

galaxy, your an unfamiliar name, so are many of you. Assuming you're all relatively new holders you probably can't answer that question for yourself - if you go back through time you will see many "old" holders, such as myself.

This has always been a great project, and the opening post made me chuckle abit. new higher capex, but better long term, lower costs? ALready at the lower cost they haven't been able to find funding for god knows how long, and that is why this thing hasn't taken off. Becuase the majority of us recognise the old dead horse being flogged again. Sure it may turn good, but for most there's no reason not to start off fresh on a new stock. NOthings seemed to change but tweaking some plans, no new oz, or funding plans (Look back over announcements since 2012, 2013, funding was always 'imminent' ).

If anything though this did give me the chance to sell of what remaining Options I had left , surprised someone even took them. They were the result of yet a foolish decision to subscribe to more options to replace the ones expired and.. ironically lost down the drain thanks to the sluggishness and lost/empty promises that had gone unfulfilled pre 2014.

Not trying to be too critical but I assume there are many more old holders that could vouch for this too. GLTAH though, heck i could be wrong and this could skyrocket and i'd be crying, but i'll stay with probability.