And beside it is your own web page and countless presentation...

And beside it is your own web page and countless presentation that defined the goal post in the first place .....don't have a hissy fit at me for pointing out the change of criteria for results when you guys are the one who have been preaching what it is going to look like....secondary tumors shrinking. .....what a joke.....Call it one thing in all your investor presentations and then slip a new definition and hope no one notices.



website -
"That hope is called an abscopal response. This is where a small number of tumours (usually 1 or 2) are exposed to radiotherapy with the aim of shrinking them, only to find that not just the irradiated tumours shrink, but the tumours outside of the irradiation zone in distant parts of the body also respond by shrinking or even disappearing."

Annual report_
"With cancer, an abscopal response is mainly associated with radiotherapy where the application of radiation to 1 or 2 isolated tumours leads to the remission of some or all tumours in other parts of the body where no radiation could possibly have been received. The abscopal response, whatever it is, once triggered leads to some or all of the remaining, untreated tumours shrinking or even disappearing completely over the following few months."

And why was there no ASX ann of Ian Minns resignation if he left on good terms.