A big part of the Plaintiff's case has been struck out by the...

A big part of the Plaintiff's case has been struck out by the court and yet the plaintiff claims to have had a win.

The Financial Review reports that "The judge allowed the case to proceed on the narrower scope that the loans were not properly transferred, and hence cannot be enforced by the bank. Mr Navara's lawyer, Daren Anderson, said his client preferred to fight the case on the narrower basis."

What a load of rubbish.

If the plaintiff preferred to fight the case on the narrower basis i.e. the legality of transferring the loans why didn't he/she prepare their Statement of Claim along those lines in the first place.

If anyone has had a win then the victor is the bank.