EMC2 is right in that each $100 mill (net) from AETD sale provides BEPPA holders with ~ 13c in addition to the 43c.
A $100 mill variation however only impacts on BAM's take home pay by $1 mill ie 1% of $100 mill.
Suggest it would be in BAM's best interest to simply wrap a deal up quickly as there is no incentive for BAM to maximise sale value for EPS holders - who unfortunately are (again) taking all the risk with no control over process.
Re Mikes100 - There is no one looking after BEPPA holder interests - otherwise the AETD sale revision would not have been required - it was Bronte's initiative - well done Bronte.
The lack of any detail on governance and the process to maximise AETD return to EPS holders remains a concern as there is still no one looking after our interests.
Implementing the above will not cost anything!
And can be a win for both BAM and BEPPA.
C'mon BBI this is an opportunity to demonstrate you can do something positive for investors - important for your credibility considering the lost shareholder value.
Are you up to the challenge?
BBI Price at posting:
3.6¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Held