First point debatable due to the "saviour" status of the...

First point debatable due to the "saviour" status of the CSI/Plan proponents. They have the strengths and weaknesses of each hand worked out already, and have played them all off in some way and will continue to do so, at will. Expecting anything else is un-realistic. It is all a matter of degrees, they tried to queue jump AETD claims and were challenged which they expected and yet it still surprised them that someone else would have the gall to question them, yet it was not enough to faze them. There is nothing stopping them doing anything similar unless there is enough further resistance.

If Grant Samuel fags can be employed to extract satisfying solutions and reports which will also make the dozy regulators content as a side benefit, then similar can be done to work around the charges of conflict of interest, until and unless challenged by stronger legal forces than requesting BBI investor services to take a note and mention it please.

ASIC is the one to contact with this subject as a specific concern. There will be no direct action to intervene of course, not until the outcome is finalised. ASIC are there only to prosecute the fools who really dumb it up, not to interfere in outcomes where risk tolerant investors need their bottles warmed because the cream is separating.

2nd point incorrect. 4c each BBI equalling 12c per Beppa benefit in VA ! ? ! will be vaporised into vulture droppings in VA, along with a lot of other tidbits, and most already accept that as a forgone outcome.

If you doubt the voracity and gall of these players, read the last four months posts.

ifandwhen