You took thatphrase totally out of context. Lets lookat complete statement “ It's not an issue for us, by the way. With this, one ofthe neat things is we can simply blend material back in if it's not on specspecifically” She was tellingus that no material was loss that it could be reprocessed. What makes you think it is OK to totallychange the context of a statement. Thisblending back in causes increased cost and time delays from processing twice. What don’t you get about this?
Ido believe it is not a major issue in fact last nights call where AL said thepurity level was being resolved was very encouraging. What I havean issue with is you telling me I do not get it ‘there is no purity problem’ when there clearly was as confirmed lastnight. Then totally fabricating the 21 day thing with all your fakeauthority. If you wouldjust give your opinion with out all the false statement about how I don’t getit I would not reply nearly as often. But when you tell me how dumb I am and you are wrong I will reply. I do not care how many time I am deleted. Youdo not do this to just me but everyone that does not agree with you. That totally stifles all conversation.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AUS ? on USB
You took thatphrase totally out of context. Lets lookat...
Add LYC (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
$6.88 |
Change
0.100(1.47%) |
Mkt cap ! $6.552B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$6.81 | $6.93 | $6.74 | $19.63M | 2.851M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 14245 | $6.88 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$6.89 | 157125 | 9 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
8 | 199853 | 2.100 |
10 | 344199 | 2.090 |
12 | 173545 | 2.080 |
8 | 132357 | 2.070 |
5 | 29042 | 2.060 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
2.110 | 132652 | 8 |
2.120 | 195216 | 18 |
2.130 | 132928 | 9 |
2.140 | 133591 | 12 |
2.150 | 426925 | 28 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 29/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
LYC (ASX) Chart |