The value of the assets are by far much more than the amount claimed on rent and bills, I can't tell you the exact amount without looking it up in an asic doc, but I can tell you the amount is more than 40k. How does it make sense to take a loss of more than 40k by not paying rent. Risk letting someone else getting hold of the very technology the first round of investors bought into, seems crazy to me.
What if a company with far more resources that 333d has buys them? Does that mean you all do your dough?
I see that this info had been kept from the investing public in the prospectus. I bet those who bought in but didn't know would be less than happy to know these things.
My guess is ASIC might get some sort of value out of this development too.
Can any of you make any sense out of this?
The value of the assets are by far much more than the amount...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 51 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
