Zweig looks good glancing at its definition, and as successful indicators that are still surviving, fits past data well, statistical Darwinism.
Along with other indicators, eg Davis (even though any indicator constructed is always dependent on same complete data set, even though they might neglect some or many data streams), does build a more positive spin.
articles of interest - spx, page-6
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 10 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add SPX (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.1¢ |
Change
0.001(10.0%) |
Mkt cap ! $47.56M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.0¢ | 1.1¢ | 1.0¢ | $10.11K | 1.011M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 1167180 | 1.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1¢ | 2124522 | 12 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 14.19pm 27/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SPX (ASX) Chart |
