Hey Mick, I reckon that other thread was pretty much on the money, within reasonable bounds of speculation from the poor info feed we got. At least this time we got a picture which means I didn't need to read the words in the announcement this time, and again state:
"I personally don't read much into the promo spiels when they come from accountants (or lawyers) - they don't know coprolite from smectite, or the fuzzy area between competent assumption and blind speculation."
How pertinent yet again, more so if it weren't for the picture this time. Some of these guys ought to read HC more often.
