Share
clock Created with Sketch. 28/10/15
09:09
Share
Originally posted by ainsleym
↑
I've followed the banter back and forth and it would seem that there is a predominance of postings skewed towards he drill not having intercepted nickel sulphide. Time will tell on this, but what intrigues me is the fact that when the first hole was drilled and the results reported on 13 May, the announcement categorically stated that the hole had intersected iron sulphide. This was obviously based on visual evaluation because the report then goes on to state that samples will be sent to the lab. The iron sulphide was identified ( visually) as pyrrhotite and some pyrite
Expand
ainsleym, by far the best post so far in relation to latest announcement. Very fair and balanced. I also read it a similar way.
