Are we overlooking something, page-27

Its OK slagging off the "experts" for expressing an opinion, but when companies release highly ambiguous ASX announcements that's what happens. Its almost like sometimes they actually want to keep the market in suspense ? Don't know why really.

If they were concerned about being in breach of 3.1 what they should have done is gone into a trading halt, released the information about the sulphides, and then hot-shot a few rock chip assays from the core through the lab on 24 hour turnaround. The labs aren't too busy in WA at the moment.