stoops . "So if the CUX resource can be exploited and the Ce and La removed at less cost than the mining and processing of the NTU price " Could you please rephrase that sentence ,remove the "IF" so it is more factual than a personal opinion.
As you pointed out,AT THE MOMENT , CUX got a better jorc resource than NTU. That is a + for CUX. Now i like you reflect on SMSL and their opposition to the Lynas/LAMP because of their perceived level of RADIO ACTIVITIES. My question is How does the RADIO ACTIVIES (uranium and thorium content) of CUX compares with NTU ? The answer explains why one is doing better than the other.
Hope you don t take this as an "attack" Just looking for facts . The Positives and the negatives.
CUX Price at posting:
3.3¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held