anyone worked out costs?, page-48

stoops .
"So if the CUX resource can be exploited and the Ce and La removed at less cost than the mining and processing of the NTU price "
Could you please rephrase that sentence ,remove the "IF" so it is more factual than a personal opinion.

As you pointed out,AT THE MOMENT , CUX got a better jorc resource than NTU. That is a + for CUX.
Now i like you reflect on SMSL and their opposition to the Lynas/LAMP because of their perceived level of RADIO ACTIVITIES.
My question is
How does the RADIO ACTIVIES (uranium and thorium content) of CUX compares with NTU ?
The answer explains why one is doing better than the other.

Hope you don t take this as an "attack"
Just looking for facts . The Positives and the negatives.