So if we use the profit before tax, the graph I posted in the other thread is wrong, as I used net profit after tax from the profit and loss statement for the half year. Which was exactly why I created this post in the first place cause I realised the tax losses carried forward would likely mean no tax paid.
If doubling the half year to approximate the full year is a reasonable guess for the full year (and people need to make their own mind up about this, I do 'close enough is good enough' type analysis) then really we could be looking at a full year profit of around $2.2M rather than the $1.5M I guesstimated in my graph.
GRB Price at posting:
5.8¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held