A mate ran the theory past me and I find it feasable. How else...

A mate ran the theory past me and I find it feasable. How else do you explain guidance not being restated? CIA is one of their biggest contributers in terms of profits and will do NPAT of $15m. You are therfore implying that an increase of an additional $7.5m in profits does not require a restatement of guidance and that they are using this as breathing room?!?!?

If they do not beat guidance by exactly $7.5m minimum, then they have stuffed it up.

You have to admit bigger mistakes have gone past public companies in the past e.g. Centro and incorrect classification of a billion or so in debt as non current!!