JTYes that WAS bizarre. They were obviously just there to push...

JT

Yes that WAS bizarre. They were obviously just there to push through the merger .. nothing else. The lawyer probably knew that being the case he would be wasting his own time talking about it.

His main point other than the deal being bad and the GGX assets being of questionable value was that THIS was the ONLY meeting and only opportunity for OIP shareholders to qestion the board on the Scheme of Arrangement. "Trust us we are your board" just didn't work for me this time.

After the meeting I looked through the Notice of Meetin information and noticed something I had overlooked beforehand .. page 5 under header "PEL 6, PEL 422 and PEL 424". PEL 6 lease HAS EXPIRED!!!!!!!!!!!!! And the other two are due to expire in 3 months. They expect them to be regranted BUT ... the plot thickens???

H