announcement out at 1.20pm, page-21

Does anyone holding CHM seriously believe that the Judge would have given two alternatives in terms of compensation owed to CHM that are as far apart as is being suggested???

I.e. CHM holders believe the judgement awarded as follows:

Option 1. CHM gets $270k plus compound interest;
Option 2. CHM gets more or less 24% of $1bn

WHY would the judge have offered option 1 if option 2 (as interpreted above) was also considered fair compensation ??????? Please, explain this to me.

The payout available under option 2, whilst it might work out as a little more than option 1, will not be significantly different otherwise they would not be alternatives!!