Ann: Wodger Drilling Intersects Multiple Zones of Copper Sulphide, page-66

While we wait for the DHEM news (if we get it that is!!), if the main part of the oxide mineralisation has not come from vms then, as you say, DHEM may not reveal much.

This is an extract from one of your recent posts:

The DHEM (different geophysical method) relies on conductors and an EM response. This is good at detecting highly conductive massive sulphides. However, the chalcocite-bornite mineralisation may not provide good conductors as it is in veins, which may not be continuous over many metres like a sheet of massive sulphide. Also, bornite and chalcocite are twice to three times the copper tenor of chalcopyrite; to get 1% Cu you need half to a third as much sulphide as chalcopyrite.

Also, in the few images from Wodger, chalcocite is not visually associated with pyrite. So these are low sulphur systems, and it's unknown at this stage whether DHEM will find them (again, questioning SFR's strategy if this mineralisation style is in the eastern Bryah).

Let's see if you are right!