Looks to me the widths are exaggerated, because they appear to...

Looks to me the widths are exaggerated, because they appear to be drilling slightly down dip.

Core loss is always accounted for when sampling. In my 10+ years of exploration, I have never witnessed core loss of 26m! Companies explanation doesn't add up.

Anyway, they should head back down the road to Caribou.

"The latest holes often intersect mineralisation over significantly wider intercepts than the twinned
historical holes, predominantly due to better core recoveries in PolarX’s drilling. Examples include ZM‐
17002, which intersected a 33.4m width of mineralisation compared to 6.1m in the nearby historical hole
Z‐43 (Figure 3), and ZM‐17007, which intersected 14.5m of mineralisation compared to 1.5m in nearby
historical holes Z‐69 and Z‐70 (Figure 4)."