Oh sharks, such a big word for a Sunday morning. "Pontificate", yes, it is a Sunday word, but, as usual with you sharks, completely WRONG in your description of what I stated quite correctly and factually and which YOU confirmed in your own post.
"(which AKK shareholders DON'T do-19.6% uptake in October 2015 CR). All minor exploration companies NEED cash to survive, shareholders can't have it both ways, they don't fully support CRs and lose equity, or don't have a company.
AKK shareholders wouldn't have a company if management hadn't received support from those S.I.s!!!"
Where is THAT pontificating?? ALL FACT!! Accurate description of "dilution" in answer to the WRONG comment of the poster whom I was answering and an exact example of factual history)
And, I have made it absolutely clear that I am NOT a "shareholder" because of that very reason, this company does not have the support of its own shareholders and has a lousy record on how they spend any money contributed to it.
But, has that changed? I'm prepared to wait and see and have had a modest punt with the oppies on the outcome as they alone can provide a reasonable percentage gain if all goes well and not so far to drop and lose if they don't. My kind of punt.
Can't wait for the next ann.
AKK Price at posting:
0.6¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
