It's not the point, anyway. We were reinstated on the 16th Jan with an "acquisition of AK mine completed". We then went into a TH following a "routine" "financial completion of AK" announcement, then had two directors proposed/announced, the q'ly released, had 18million shares released as bonuses, then went into suspension, and then had an off-screen CR that was *not* announced to the market; it simply popped up on a website and was posted to the forum.
Tell me, at what point will the "financial completion of AK" announcement be released so I can make an informed decision about being invested in the company in line with the transparent announcements you're talking about?
This is following the "anticipated to be completed before the explicit extended deadline in September" announcement that was followed by complete silence, that was followed by an indefinite extension, which took an extra two months. On the "anticipated to be completed in February" deal (announced in December and predicted to take a few weeks in January) that took 12 months in total.
At what point, exactly, is it reasonable to think that management doesn't give a toss about keeping shareholders informed? Cause I heard all that garbage back when we were in radio silence over the AK deal, and dropping three announcements and an undisclosed CR while not releasing the actual announcement that started the TH/Suspension is dodgy af. You guys are running out of excuses.
Expand
