It sounds like you want to level an accusation around trial data, but are unable to articulate it accurately, or follow through on committing to it in writing in a manner that could see it addressed.
Is there any danger of letting the trial come to a conclusion before you put Veyonda in the bin based on, shall we repeat again, PHASE 1 interim data.
It sounds like you want to level an accusation around trial...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add NOX (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
10.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $29.22M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 52445 | 10.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 11.0¢ | 14000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 07.01am 27/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| NOX (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
