In fairness to BK though most of what we post is speculation, theories, questions and challenges. Some look at potential wins and some look at potential roadblocks or at least win inhibitors. It is simply that we can all view things from a different perspective. I am guessing what BK is querying is that if we have funding from the secondary (back up if you will) source then why did the funds not come from the primary if the deal/resource etc etc is so good. As it is we have no idea where the funds have come from unless someone knows something from the meeting. We could fire off an email or a tweet or two to attempt to find out but considering we are only days away anyway is it worth the aggravation? To be honest I couldn't care if the funds were raised with a whip around at the front bar however I think I get where BK is coming from?
Once we all know then punters make their choice. Some will sell for a myriad of reasons and some will hold for just as many varied reasons.
When gold was spiking very second post (ok slight exaggeration ) was a chart and prediction on the great timing. Now gold has lost 3 weeks of gains in a week no one talks gold atm.
Where will gold be in 12 months? Who knows but hopefully north of here and if/when we get to mining stage in 12 to 18 months then happy days for holders. Those clever enough to sell the highs and buy back in well good luck to them and well done. I am just not that clever. If on the other hand gold tanks to the $1100's again then maybe the project won't be as lucrative?
Bottom line is we will have an opinion and the market is big enough for all of us.
Ok...rastes maybe the exception
