Hey2. Well said and you have clarified in my mind where you...

Hey2. Well said and you have clarified in my mind where you stand. I don't necessarily agree with all your comments about solutions for HDY but I respect your right to present those points. Maybe we can agree to acknowledge those slight differences in viewpoints and still work together on the same team (Oh dear that will have Silent-Bubbles seeing collusion and scheming going on.....sorry about that).

I agree that there are two HDYs involved here.

There is the HDY that happens to have some prospects/projects on its books that could have some value if HDY took its brief as a mining company seriously to heart and actually did some actual testing and mining of the prospects.

Then there is the HDY that happens to be "managed" by people who, IMHO and "amateur" status, do not seem to be interested in the physical mining side of things and do not seem to have any expertise in that sphere.

So I would argue for the ASX to cramp the present Board's performance by a set of requirements if it is allowed to have its suspension lifted. I am not so lenient on the HDY response as you appear to be and see no value in HDY's offer of appointing extra members to the Board to appease the ASX. To leave HDY in charge of who they select or buddy up with makes a mockery of that offer.

Tiresome it may be for some who want to believe the "good news" story put out by Clee &Co. but I will continue to identify faults and failings despite not having any shares in the company. As I have said before my connection is through VIC and the merry pickle it finds itself in as well. So the battle goes on.