@cfp - hope you are sitting down, I agree with you on this The...

@cfp - hope you are sitting down, I agree with you on this

The lack of a table is no ones fault other than GPP's management and is another indication that they sit around doing nothing, twiddling their thumbs.
You are trying to tell everyone because Watts is in Guyana is the reason behind there being no table?

As for raw data, if an uneducated person (fooca) can sit at home on his computer and convert PPM into Li20 surely you would think that someone at GPP head quarters (we are an exploration company) could of done the exact same thing with the tables of raw data, could they not?
Someone should inform management that there is a thing called the internet, email, telephone or whatever else mining companies use when working in other countries.

I will put it to you this way, if the results were exceptional, fantastic, world class, highest ever seen in a maiden drill campaign, there would been a table attached to the announcement, no doubt about it.

Also, if this management team we currently have were doing there job, they would of been expecting these results and as such should of had an announcement with all the formatting done, including any grade intersection graphs ready to have the data inserted.

Let actually talk about the timing of the results as well, conveniently been over shadowed by 3 announcements in a short time after market has closed....


Hole 1 pulps arrived at the lab on the 12th May
Hole 2 pulps arrived at the lab on the 20th May
Hole 3 pulps arrived at the lab on the "undisclosed date"
My understanding is the pulps are tested and as soon as data is available it gets sent to the company, with this in mind has the company stock piled results and then released them altogether considering the time differences of the results arriving in Perth.
As hole 3 wasn't mentioned in any announcements as arriving at Perth, we can safely assume that is was some time after the 20th May. We could also safely assume that it would be at least 7 days (time difference between pulps being prepared in Georgetown and arriving at Perth for holes 1 & 2) so (guessing) hole 3 pulps arrived on the 28th May, and we have results already (9days) makes the curiosity piqued.

Conspiracy theory "did GPP have the hole 1 results back from the labs" prior to the EGM??????????

I thought the intent of sampling being sent when each hole was completed would provide a continuous news flow?

All IMO only
cheers

edit: Oh dear, an amended announcement...... too funny, and not worth the read.......