@fooca I wouldn't talk and say "we have poo" before I see the...

@fooca
I wouldn't talk and say "we have poo" before I see the assay results table.

As I said above 564 ppm for hole 3 is given as the weighted average lithium value over the entire length of the hole which 142m. It's not max. grade. There should be high grade part of the hole length which compensates the very low and/or zero grade parts of the hole. We all know that.

However yes we have problems. The problems might be;

1) Something happened and they could couldn't give the assay results in table. We can't make an assumption that this is management's fault or ASX's fault or a computer's fault. But the problem is that the management was not aware of it after the anns. because they couldn't correct it immediately. It was good that the market was closed. I hope they will give these amended tables asap.

2) We all know that John Watts is in Guyana even though he is on the anns as the competent person (I don't know how though. Don't ask me), but the current management people who are in charge of making the anns. used the raw data from the lab. The lab would give only the assay table and ave. grade for the whole length of hole.

3) An assay lab wouldn't give you the high grade intersection and highlight them on a schematic graph report I guess. It's the work for GPP's geo IMO. A geo would be able to show the high grade intersection by a graphic on the anns. Unfortunately John wouldn't be here and there at the same time.