Firstly CUB let me state where you are irresponsible ..you...

Firstly CUB let me state where you are irresponsible ..you stated 'loosing the toll treatment agreement with Billabong has set the project backwards not forwards.as per ASX announcement ' VANGO did NOT loose it! Vango decided to go it alone...also you state that this is a low cost opportunity forgone...Are you aware of the disproportionate off take margins Billabong would have received ? Billabong would have gleefully accepted the arrangement if it were not for the termination by Vango. So your comment is not correct....also despite your long standing history re post Barrack have you actually been to the Plutonic Dome in particular Trident and K2 and Marwest tenements ? where you state that VAN does not have the same infrastructure as EAR..incorrect (see video attached to last post)..You are also assuming that the project is not fully financed,,however where I do fully agree with you is the track record of management is ugly ...it has cost me a small fortune to remain undiluted. A high price to pay for being a pre IPO shareholder for the last 15 years. Hopefully (please see video) the mining expertise currently in the management team will help rectify this situation.